[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Count This!

To: <cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Count This!
From: "Paul Tiger - LPBC - Outreach" <outreach@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 09:17:39 -0600
Delivered-to: mailing list cvv-discuss@coloradovoter.net
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <20050615232124.GC31192@big>
List-help: <mailto:cvv-discuss-help@coloradovoter.net>
List-post: <mailto:cvv-discuss@coloradovoter.net>
List-subscribe: <mailto:cvv-discuss-subscribe@coloradovoter.net>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:cvv-discuss-unsubscribe@coloradovoter.net>
Mailing-list: contact cvv-discuss-help@coloradovoter.net; run by ezmlm
Reply-to: <outreach@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Wow. So if you don't have a sword you cannot vote? Sounds like more impetus
for a repressive government to disarm its citizens, eh?

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul E Condon [mailto:pecondon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 5:21 PM
To: cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: ERC Report Draft Insults Election Reform Activists

FYI, a recent edition of Wall Street Journal had an article on the
raised sword method. It _is_ still used in at least one small canton.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Count This!
  - From: Paul E Condon

References:
- Re: ERC Report Draft Insults Election Reform Activists
  - From: Paul E Condon

Prev by Date: Discussion of ERC Report FINAL, hopefully not Insults
Next by Date: RE: Discussion of ERC Report FINAL, hopefully not Insults
Previous by thread: Re: ERC Report Draft Insults Election Reform Activists
Next by thread: Re: Count This!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread