RE: prune inactive topics?

["Some Guy" <someguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Just frustrated that the hundreds of hours of work by 10 people appointed by
the Commissioners has dropped to some buried link. I looked at a wayback
machine and found a discrepancy in the CVV reported movement of links. Sorry
to fly off, but the real issue for me is that this work has been pushed out
of the limelight.

The fact is that the ERC did this work at the behest of the BoCC. The Clerk
responded with a 29 page report that pretty much said 'blow it out your ass'
and moved on to more secret manipulations.

Despite what we would all like to see in the way of public understand and
believability, most people will believe a government report over the
rantings of the citizens. It is just nutz and I don't like it, but I
understand it.
I am clearly one of the ranters.

You all will recall that the county IT dept refused to publish the work of
the ERC and when it finally published the report it almost immediately
disconnected the ERC report and replaced it with the response from the
clerk.
If you go to the county website and enter "ERC" into the search engine the
first link that you will see is
www.co.boulder.co.us/bocc/pdf/ERCResponse.pdf which is the Clerk's response.
In point of fact it is the only document listed related to the ERC.
It is like we never existed as a county entity.

Sorry to be so pissy Paul. I am pissed in general terms. The work of the ERC
was not recognized by the county has having value. Which is exactly what
Ralph told me would happen. I wasn't listening. I am a fool.

And yes I will copy the contents to another site in the near future, but
right now I have to concentrate on the matter at hand. In two days the
comment period will officially close. Rest assured that it will NEVER close.
People should not bend over for the anal sex that is being delivered by the
commissioners and clerk.

paul