[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Boulder County's counting crawls



Lou (et al),

Seemingly unbeknownst to most voters, bleed through has no impact on the scanning process. The boxes from one side to the other do not overlap. Not even close. The system is looking for marks inside the boxes. Marks outside the boxes don't register at all.

However, your idea that white-out flakes could be the cause is something to consider. The real test would be to collect some of this offending "dust" and chemically analyze it. It bothers me that the clerk's office would make such definitive pronouncements about what the interfering material was. For all we know it could be ricin.

Paul Tiger
303.774.6383

 


Lou Puls wrote:

If I may add my modest comments to the ongoing blizzard, I would like to ask WHY the highly informed, sincere, and reasonable CiITIZEN Kolwicz was excluded from the PUBLIC machine- and procedure-testing opportunities?

Also I would like to add an admittedly speculative comment to the discussion of the "paper dust" mystery: 

Perhaps among those many voters who tried using a felt-tip (black or blue) pen to fill in the boxes, and who found to their horror that the ink bled through to the opposite side of the ballot and decidedly MARKED the other side (foolishly also to be scanned), and who were unwillling or unable to obtain a fresh set of ballots, such voters instead applied some white-out pigment or adhesive bits to the offending bleed-through marks? 

Have the likely flakes and bits of flotsam resulting from such an ill-advised remediation become what are being termed the mysterious "paper dust"?  Even a ball-point pen (black or blue), if not bleeding-through, produces a "looming"-through of a shadow-mark, which a sensitive image scanner could easily acquire, encouraging such a faulty remediation.

Lou

-----Original Message-----
From: Al Kolwicz
Sent: Nov 6, 2008 11:11 AM
To: 'Harvie Branscomb' , ColoradoVoter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Hillary Hall' , 'Margit Johansson' , 'Deb Adams' , 'Geof Cahoon' , 'David Larson' , angielayton@xxxxxxxx, 'Ivan Meek' , 'joseph richey' , 'Mary Eberle' , 'Cliff West' , 'Tom Morris' , 'Dan Leftwich' , 'CFVI Attendees' , 'Citizens for Verifiable Voting' , 'erika jensen' , 'Neal McBurnett' , 'Ken Gordon' , 'Morgan Carroll' , 'Paul Weissman' , 'Ron Tupa' , 'Teak Simonton' , 'Kathleen Curry' , 'Jared Polis' , 'Bill Hobbs' , 'John Kefalas'
Subject: RE: Boulder County's counting crawls

Harvie,

 

I have a different take on your question, “Why hasn’t Boulder County Clerk Hillary Hall heard about dust problems on her Hart Scanners? 


[ ... ] 

... (Not to sound like sour grapes, I was not permitted to serve.) ...

[ ... ]

Al Kolwicz

Colorado Voter Group

2867 Tincup Circle

Boulder, CO 80305

303-494-1540

AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx

www.ColoradoVoterGroup.org

www.coloradovotergroup.blogspot.com

 

Being ignorant is not such a shame as being unwilling to learn.
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, Poor Richard's Almanack, 1758

No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.0/1772 - Release Date: 11/6/2008 8:23 PM

--